Beyond Chicken-Free Grilled Strips: Nutrition & Labelgrade B (79/100)
B 79 / 100 — Per-gram protein density that rivals plain cooked chicken (23.5g per 100g vs chicken's 31g), with zero saturated fat. The trade-off is a 22-ingredient list including soy protein isolate and titanium dioxide as a colorant — engineered, not whole food.
🛒 Buy on Amazon →The short answer
Beyond Chicken-Free Grilled Strips deliver 20g of protein for 120 calories in a 3 oz (85g) serving — 23.5g per 100g, dense enough to sit near plain cooked chicken (31g) and well above any breaded chicken nugget. Two-thirds of the calories come from protein, and there’s zero saturated fat, the one thing the Beyond Burger can’t claim. It earns a B (79/100). The strips are grilled and unbreaded, so this is a lean protein-delivery ingredient — a salad, wrap, and stir-fry component — not a fried-food experience.
Why the B
| Dimension | Grade | Score | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein density | A- | 85 / 100 | 23.5g per 100g — rivals plain cooked meat, from a soy + pea isolate base that’s a complete protein |
| Ingredient quality | C+ | 68 / 100 | 22 ingredients, all FDA-recognized as safe, but built on isolates, maltodextrin, and a titanium-dioxide colorant — engineered, not whole food |
| Saturated fat | A+ | 100 / 100 | 0g — the grilled format skips the coconut/frying fat that loads burgers and nuggets |
| Sugar | A+ | 100 / 100 | 0g, as it should be for a savory strip |
| Sodium | D | 54 / 100 | 350mg per serving — meaningful, and the second real ding |
| Fiber | D | 47 / 100 | 2g, from soy and carrot fiber — modest, not the point of the food |
The grade tells an honest story: this is a near-A protein held to a B by exactly two things. Sodium at 350mg is real — about 15% of a day’s limit in one 3 oz portion, and it climbs fast if you eat the whole bag. Ingredient quality is the other: nothing on the panel is alarming, but a 22-item list anchored by protein isolates is the definition of engineered food, and the titanium-dioxide colorant is the single ingredient most likely to give a shopper pause. Strip those two penalties away and the protein, fat, and sugar scores would put it in A territory.
The number that actually matters: protein per calorie
The headline here isn’t the 20g — plenty of foods hit that. It’s how cheaply, in calories, you get it. Beyond Strips spend 6.0 calories per gram of protein. The breaded chicken nuggets people reach for in the same freezer aisle are nowhere close: Tyson runs about 19 calories per gram (270 cal for 14g of protein), Applegate about 16 (190 cal for 12g). That gap is structural — a nugget is mostly breading and the oil it’s set in, so most of its calories are starch and fat, not protein. Strip the breading away, as Beyond does, and the protein-to-calorie ratio roughly triples.
How it compares to real chicken nuggets
Both products below are graded in our database, so these are verified figures, normalized per 100g:
| Product | Labelgrade | Protein / 100g | Saturated fat / 100g | Sodium / 100g | Cholesterol / 100g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beyond Chicken-Free Strips (this product) | B (78) | 23.5g | 0g | 412mg | 0mg |
| Tyson Chicken Nuggets (breaded) | C+ (69) | 15.6g | 4.4g | 522mg | 44mg |
| Applegate Chicken Nuggets (breaded) | B- (74) | 14.3g | 1.8g | 405mg | 42mg |
Beyond grades higher than both, and the table shows why: it’s denser in protein than either, carries no saturated fat where Tyson carries 4.4g, and has zero cholesterol. The one place a nugget can claim a partial win is ingredient simplicity — Applegate’s cleaner, shorter panel actually out-scores Beyond on ingredient quality (B+ vs C+) — but Applegate gives up too much protein density and sits with the breading penalty to catch Beyond on the overall grade.
Where it fits — and where it doesn’t
This is the meatless option to keep on hand for salads, wraps, grain bowls, and stir-fries, where you want shreddable protein that absorbs a sauce and doesn’t drag fat and cholesterol into the dish. It is not trying to be a fried treat, and it won’t fool a chicken purist on texture. The honest caution is sodium: at 350mg a serving, it’s fine as a component but adds up if the strips become a daily staple, so treat the whole bag as three servings, not one. Compared with Beyond’s own Burger — same brand, 20g of protein — the Strips are the leaner formulation, trading the Burger’s coconut-oil “meatiness” (and its saturated fat) for a cleaner fat profile.
Ingredients
Water, soy protein isolate, pea protein isolate, chicken flavor (yeast extract, maltodextrin, natural flavoring, salt, sunflower oil, citric acid), rice flour, expeller-pressed canola oil, soy fiber, carrot fiber, and — at 0.5% or less each — white vinegar, spices, salt, sugar, molasses powder, dipotassium phosphate, titanium dioxide (for color), potassium chloride, and paprika. (Verbatim from the USDA Branded Foods entry, FDC 2031061.)
Where to buy
Affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. The Labelgrade score is independent of affiliate relationships. More.
🔬 Compare this product side-by-side with any other →
Quick Facts
Per serving · 3 oz (85 g)
See how this fits your day — protein calculator · macro calculator
Full nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per Serving (3 oz (85 g)) |
|---|---|
| Calories | 120 |
| Protein | 20g |
| Total Fat | 3g |
| Saturated Fat | 0g |
| Trans Fat | 0g |
| Total Carbohydrates | 5g |
| Dietary Fiber | 2g |
| Total Sugars | 0g |
| Added Sugars | 0g |
| Sodium | 350mg |
| Cholesterol | 0mg |
| Calcium | 60mg |
| Iron | 2.7mg |
Scope: This page applies specifically to Beyond Chicken-Free Grilled Strips · UPC 852629004033. Other sizes, flavors, or formulations may differ.
How this fits each diet
Each score is computed from the same USDA nutrition + ingredient data, against the published rules of each diet. They tell you "does this food fit this diet" — not whether the diet is right for you.
contains animal-derived ingredients
contains meat, fish, or gelatin
no wheat, barley, rye, or malt detected in USDA ingredient list
Frequently Asked Questions
How much protein is in Beyond Chicken-Free Grilled Strips?
20 grams per 3 oz (85g) serving for just 120 calories — that's 23.5g of protein per 100g (USDA FDC 2031061). The full 9 oz bag holds roughly 60g of protein across its three servings.
Why only a B if the protein density is so high?
Two dimensions cap it. Sodium scores a D (350mg per serving), and ingredient quality scores a C+ — a 22-item panel built on soy and pea protein isolate, with maltodextrin and titanium dioxide for color. Protein density (A-), saturated fat (A+), and sugar (A+) are all strong; those two penalties are what keep it at 78 instead of the high 80s.
What is the protein actually made of?
Soy protein isolate (the first protein ingredient) and pea protein isolate — not faba or wheat. The soy-plus-pea blend is a complete protein, covering all nine essential amino acids, which a single plant protein often can't do alone. The 'chicken flavor' is a separate yeast-extract-based blend, not a protein source.
How does it compare to real chicken nuggets on protein per calorie?
It's far more efficient. Beyond Strips spend about 6 calories per gram of protein; Tyson Chicken Nuggets spend roughly 19 (270 cal for 14g) and Applegate about 16 (190 cal for 12g). Two-thirds of Beyond's calories come from protein, versus only a fifth of Tyson's — the breading and frying oil on a real nugget is mostly fat and starch.
Why does the label say 'Chicken-Free'?
Poultry-labeling law. Because the product contains no chicken, it can't be sold under the bare word 'chicken,' so the registered name carries 'Chicken-Free.' The front of the bag reads 'Beyond Chicken'; the legal product name does not.
Is it keto-friendly?
Yes — 5g total carbs minus 2g fiber leaves 3g net carbs per serving. But at only 3g of fat it's a lean, high-protein food, not a fat-forward one, so on a fat-target keto plan you'd pair it with oil or avocado.
Is the titanium dioxide a problem?
It's used at sub-0.5% purely for white color and is permitted as a food additive in the US, though the EU banned it in 2022 over theoretical genotoxicity concerns. If you actively avoid it, this is the one ingredient on the panel to flag — it's why ingredient quality scores a C+ rather than higher.